|
Yogācāra (Skt: "yoga practice"), also spelled yogāchāra, is an influential
school of philosophy and psychology that developed in Indian Mahayana Buddhism starting sometime in the fourth to fifth
centuries C.E., also commonly known as Consciousness-only (Skt:
Chittamatra).
Sometimes referred to as the Knowledge Way or Vijnanavada, Yogācāra has also been called Subjective Realism,
acknowledging that individual factors including karma contribute to an experience of reality that must be different for every
being. It mentions the idea of "Buddha nature."
The Yogācāra texts were composed in the period of Buddhism known to practitioners as The Third
Turning of the Wheel. The Yogācāra studies texts form a survey of all of The
Three Turnings of the Wheel. Originating around a set of scriptures and
treatises composed by such early Indian masters as the brothers Vasubandhu and
Asanga (who was said to be inspired by the legendary Maitreyanatha), this school held a
prominent position in the Indian scholastic tradition for several centuries. It was also
transmitted to Tibet, where its teachings became an integral part of much of Tibetan Buddhism up to modern times, and to East Asia, where it was studied with intensity for several centuries.
Notably, this school was in opposition to the Madhyamaka (Skt: "Middle Way")
school of Buddhism. While the Madhyamaka school asserted that there is no ultimately real thing, the Yogācāra school
asserts that the only mind is ultimately existent. This debate still rages in Tibet as the Shentong (noble conduct) versus Rangtong (noble view). Yogachara teachings are
especially important in Tantric Buddhism, or the secret practices
of Buddhism. It is often said that many Tibetan students learn the Madhyamaka school until they have mastered it, and when they
are ready switch to the Yogācāra school.
Yogācāra, like all Indian schools of Buddhism, eventually became virtually extinct within its mother country.
However, all four of the major schools of Buddhism did heavily influence the schools of Tibetan Buddhism. Yogācāra is
most prevalent in the Nyingma school of Tibetan Buddhism. In addition, the teachings
of Yogācāra became the Chinese Fa
Xiang school of Buddhism.
The Yogacaras defined three basic modes by which we perceive our world: one, through attached and erroneous discrimination,
wherein things are incorrectly apprehended based on preconceptions; two, through the correct understanding of the dependently originated nature of things; and three, by
apprehending things as they are in themselves, uninfluenced by any conceptualization at all. These are referred to in
Yogācāra as the three natures of perception. Also, regarding perception, the Yogacaras emphasized that our everyday
understanding of the existence of external objects is problematic, since in order to perceive any object (and thus, for all
practical purposes for the object to "exist"), there must be a sensory organ as well as a correlative type of consciousness to
allow the process of cognition to occur.
Perhaps the best known teaching of the Yogācāra system is that of the eight layers of consciousness. This theory of
the consciousnesses attempted to explain all the phenomena of cyclic existence, including how rebirth occurs and precisely how
karma functions on an individual basis. For example, if I carry out a good or evil act,
why and how is it that the effects of that act do not appear immediately? If they do not appear immediately, where is this
karma waiting for its opportunity to play out?
The answer given by the Yogacaras was the store
consciousness (also known as the base, or eighth
consciousness; Skt., ālayavijñāna) which simultaneously acts as a storage place for karma and as a fertile
matrix that brings karma to a state of fruition. The likeness of this process to the
cultivation of plants led to the creation of the metaphor of seeds (Skt, bijas) to explain
the way karma is stored in the eighth consciousness. The type, quantity, quality and strength of the seeds determine where and
how a sentient being will be reborn: one's species, sex, social status, proclivities, bodily appearance and so forth.
On the other hand, the karmic energies created in the current lifetime through repeated patterns of behavior are called habit
energies (Skt., vasanas). All the activities
that mold our minds and bodies, for better or worse--eating, drinking, talking, studying, practicing the piano or whatever--can
be understood to create habit energies. And of course, my habit energies can penetrate the consciousnesses of others, and vice
versa--what we call "influence" in everyday language. Habit energies can become seeds, and seeds can produce new habit
energies.
There are two important aspects of the Yogācāra schemata that are of special interest to modern-day practitioners.
One is that virtually all schools of Mahayana Buddhism came to rely on these Yogācāra explanations as they created their own doctrinal systems--even
the Zen schools. For example, the important Yogācāra explanation of the pervasiveness of one's delusions through
"mind-only" had an obvious influence on Zen.
The other interesting thing about the Yogācāra teachings is the extent to which they can be correlated with modern
understandings of life as seen in fields such as psychology, genetics and evolutionary biology. For example, Yogācāra
views regarding seeds appear to have many correlations with our understanding of the function of DNA--especially observing the way species are able to produce genetic mutations to adapt and survive to new
environments. They can also help to explain things such as hereditary diseases, as well as the function of group karma in recovering from diseases. However, this
genetic explanation can only go so far, as the Yogacaras did not view the eighth consciousness as a physical materialistial thing
but rather an aspect of the mind.
That Yogācāra is not yet that well known among the community of Western practitioners is probably attributable to
the fact that most of the initial transmission of Buddhism to the West has been directly concerned with more practice-oriented
forms of Buddhism, such as Zen, Vipassana,
and Pure Land. Also, it is a complicated system, and there are still not really
any good, accessible, introductory books on the topic in Western languages. However, within Tibetan Buddhism more and more
Western students are becoming acquainted with this school.
|