|
Telephone tapping or Wire tapping/ Wiretapping (in US) describes the
monitoring of telephone conversations by a third party, often by covert means.
The Telephone tap or Wire tap received its name because, historically, the monitoring
connection was applied to the wires of the telephone line of the person who was being monitored and drew off or tapped a small
amount of the electrical signal carrying the conversation.
Telephone tapping is strictly controlled in many countries to safeguard an individual's privacy. Telephone tapping often needs to be authorised by a Court, and is
normally only approved when evidence shows it is not possible to detect criminal or subversive activity in less
intrusive ways. Illegal or unauthorised telephone tapping is often a criminal offence.
There is nothing illegal about one of the parties to a telephone call recording the conversation, or giving permission for
calls to be recorded or permitting their telephone line to be tapped. Many businesses record their telephone calls for legal
reasons, so that they can prove what was said, train their staff, or monitor performance. This activity is not normally
considered telephone tapping because it is done with the knowledge of at least one of the parties to the telephone conversation.
Some advise or even ask if a conversation can be recorded. More generally, recording of an activity by a participant in the
activity is called sousveillance (the opposite of omniscient surveillance from on-high).
The official tapping of telephone lines
The contracts or licenses by which the state controls telephone companies means that
the companies must provide access for tapping lines to the security services and the police.
When telephone exchanges were mechanical, a tap had to be
installed by technicians, linking circuits together to route the audio signal from the call. Now that many exchanges are being
converted to digital technology installing taps is far simpler, and can be done by installing small plugs, or even by computer.
Telephone services provided by
cable TV companies are tapped in a similar way.
Unless the tap has been very badly installed, it is not possible to tell if your line is being tapped or not. The noises that
some people believe to be telephone taps are really just noise created by the induction of signals from other phone lines.
Because the tap is made at the exchange it is very difficult to tell if the line is tapped because there will be no appreciable
difference in volume. But irrespective of the tapping of content, communications data will always be collected automatically, and
stored for later use by the billing department of your phone company or the security
services.
For telephone services run via digital exchanges, the information generated will consist of a list of the phone numbers you
have called, the duration of the calls, and perhaps a log of the type of communications media being used (some services send data
and voice communications via different routes to conserve bandwidth).
The unofficial tapping of telephone lines
It's also possible to be tap conversations unofficially. There are a number of ways to monitor telephone conversations:
- Recording the conversation - the person making/receiving the call records the conversation using a 'telephone pickup coil'
attached to the ear-piece, or they fit an in-line tap with a recording output. Both of these are easily available through
electrical shops. Most who record telephone conversations, such as journalists, will use the recording for their own private
work. But be aware that anything you say to someone you don't know may be recorded and used for other purposes.
- Direct line tap - this is what the state does via the telephone exchange. But unofficial tapping, where the user's line is
physically tapped near the house, is also possible. The tap can either involve a direct electrical connection to the line, or a
coil placed around the line to pick up the signal inductively. There will be some drop in signal levels because of the loss of
power from the line, and it may also generate noise on the line. Direct taps usually require regular maintenance, either to
change tapes or replace batteries, which may give away their presence.
- Radio tap - this is like a bug that fits on the telephone line. The state does
not normally do this because they have access via the exchange. It can be fitted to one phone inside the house, or outside on the
phone line. It may produce noise (you might even get signal feedback down the line on amateur made equipment) to alert you, but
probably not. The unit is powered from the line so once installed it's maintenance free, and only transmits when there's a call
in progress. However these devices tend to be low powered because the drain on the line would become too great. Therefore the
receiver would have to be installed within a few hundred metres of the tap. Radio taps can be found in the same way to line taps,
by checking your line regularly.
To guard against unofficial line taps you should know where your telephone line runs, and perhaps inspect it regularly for new
joins, or small wires connected to the line.
Location data and mobile phones
Mobile phones are, in surveillance terms, a major liability. This
liability will only increase as the new third-generation (3G) phones are introduced. This is because the base stations will be
located closer together.
For mobile phones the major threat is the collection of communications data. This data not only includes information about the
time and duration of the call, but also the geographical location where the call was made from and to whom. This data can be
determined generally because the geographic communications cell that the call was made in is stored with the details of the call.
But it is also possible to get greater resolution of a person's location by combining information from a number of cells
surrounding the persons location. This additional precision must be specifically enabled by the telephone company - it is not
part of ordinary operation. There is no counter-measure against the state/telephone companies doing this.
The old first generation mobile phones could be easily monitored by anyone with a 'scanning all-band receiver' because the
system used an analogue transmission system - like an ordinary radio transmitter. The second generation digital phones are harder
to monitor because they use a digitally compressed transmission. However the state can tap mobile phones with the co-operation of
the phone company. It's also possible for organisations with the correct technical equipment, such as large corporations, to
monitor mobile phone communications and decrypt the message. There were proposals for European mobile phones to use stronger
encryption, but this was opposed by a number of European states, including the Netherlands which is one of the worlds most prolific telephone tappers. (Over 12000 phone numbers in 2003.)
Mobile phones can be used anonymously, but it is very expensive to do. Pre-paid mobile phones can be bought without having to
give details of your name or address, and because you insert cards there is no billing information. However, once you have been
identified as using a certain phone, you can be tracked. So if you require longer-term anonymity it is necessary to change the
phone every few days.
See also
External link
|