|
A Motion of Confidence is a motion of support proposed by a government in a parliament to give members of
parliament a chance to register their confidence for a government by means of a parliamentary vote. Governments often propose a
Motion of Confidence to replace a Motion of No
Confidence proposed by the opposition.
Defeat of a Motion of Confidence in a parliamentary democracy generally requires one of two actions:
- the resignation of the government, or
- a request for a parliamentary dissolution and the calling of a General Election.
Where a Motion of Confidence has been defeated (or a motion of no confidence passed), a head of state is often
constitutionally empowered (should they wish) to refuse a parliamentary dissolution if one is requested, forcing the government
back to the resignation option.
A Motion of Confidence may be proposed in the government collectively or in many member thereof, including the prime minister. In Germany, a motion of confidence is sometimes added as an
amendment to another piece of legislation.
A Motion of Confidence may also be used tactically to humilate critics of a government (often from the inside of the governing
party or parties) who nevertheless dare not vote against the government. By forcing them to vote for the government
notwithstanding their public criticism, the proposer of the motion may hope to silence or embarrass critics. It may also be used
to unite a divided party or government by creating a sense of 'one for all, all for one' loyalty, bonding a divided government
together against the opposition.
However, tactical Motions of Confidence are dangerous, as they may backfire catastrophically against those who use them, if
they have misjudged the willingness of their opponents to call the proposer's bluff and vote against the motion.
Examples of defeats of Motions of Confidence
Examples of how constitutional rules work
Bunreacht na hÉireann: Ireland's Constitution
Article 28.10
The Taoiseach shall resign from office upon his ceasing to retain the support of a majority in Dáil Éireann unless on his
advice the President dissolves Dáil Éireann and on the reassembly of Dáil Éireann after the dissolution the Taoiseach secures the
support of a majority in Dáil Éireann.
Where a Taoiseach seeks a dissolution in such circumstances, the following article comes into play.
Article 12.2.2
The President may in his absolute discretion refuse to dissolve Dáil Éireann on the advice of a Taoiseach who has ceased
to retain the support of a majority in Dáil Éireann.
The Basic Law: the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany
The German Federal Chancellor can propose a motion of Confidence to the Bundestag. Article 68 of the German Basic Law allows
that procedure:
Article 68.
(1) If a motion of a Federal Chancellor for a vote of confidence is not assented to by the majority of the members of the
Bundestag, the Federal President may, upon the proposal of the Federal Chancellor, dissolve the Bundestag within twenty-one days.
The right to dissolve shall lapse as soon as the Bundestag with the majority of its members elects another Federal
Chancellor.
(2) Forty-eight hours must elapse between the motion and the vote thereon.
After the failure of such a motion of Confidence the Federal
Chancellor can ask the Federal President to dissolve the Bundestag or to call
the Legislative State of Emergency (Gesetzgebungsnotstand).
There were up to now (2003) motions of confidence:
1. April 27, 1972:
Chancellor Willy Brandt
wants to have the Bundestag dissolved because a stalemate allows no side to act.
He loses on purpose by 233-263 votes. Federal President Gustav Heinemann
dissolved the Bundestag. The following election turns out to be a victory of Willy Brandt's programme.
2. February 5, 1982:
Chancellor Helmut
Schmidt wants the Bundestag to express its confidence in him. He wins by 269-228 votes. However, eight months later he is
sacked.
3. December 17, 1982:
Chancellor Helmut Kohl
wants to have the Bundestag dissolved in order to call new elections. He loses on purpose by 8-489 votes. The procedure -
considered by many to be unconstitutional - is affirmed by the Federal Constitutional Court.
4. November 16, 2001:
Chancellor Gerhard
Schröder wants his coalition to pass by an own majority a government motion which is to allow German soldiers to
take part in the U.S.-led military action Enduring Freedom
in Afghanistan. He wins by 336-330 votes.
|