|
In quantum physics, the Heisenberg uncertainty
principle states that one cannot simultaneously know both the position and the momentum of a given object to arbitrary precision. It furthermore precisely quantifies the imprecision. More
generally, an uncertainty relation arises between any two observable quantities defined by non-commuting operators. It is one of
the cornerstones of quantum mechanics and was discovered by
Werner Heisenberg in 1927.
Overview
The uncertainty principle is sometimes erroneously explained by claiming that the measurement of position necessarily disturbs
a particle's momentum. Heisenberg himself offered this explanation initially. The role of disturbance is not essential, however,
since precise values of momentum and of distance may well be obtained; but necessarily separately, not together, for the
same system in the same trial. Correspondingly, any one particle (in the general sense, e. g. carrying
discrete electric charge) cannot be described simultaneously as a
"classic point particle" and as a wave. (The fact itself that either one of these
descriptions can be appropriate at least in separate cases is called wave-particle duality; a change of appropriate descriptions according to measured values is known as
wavefunction collapse.)
The uncertainty principle (as initially considered by Heisenberg) is concerned with cases in which neither of these
two descriptions is fully and exclusively appropriate, such as a particle in a box with a particular energy value; i. e. systems which are characterized
neither by one unique "position" (one particular value of distance form a potential wall) nor by one unique
value of momentum (incl. its direction).
Consider the following analogy: suppose you have a time-varying signal such as a sound wave, and you want to know the exact
frequencies in your signal at an exact moment in time. This is impossible: in order to determine the frequencies accurately, you
need to sample the signal for some time and you thereby lose time precision. (In other words, a sound cannot have both a precise
time, as in a short pulse, and a precise frequency, as in a continuous pure tone.) The time and frequency of a wave in time are
analogous to the position and momentum of a wave in space.
More generally, any interdependence between the distributions of measured values obtained from various trials which is
expressed by the uncertainty principle is due to interdependence, if any, of the definitions of the corresponding measurable
quantities.
Definition
The statement is as follows. If several identical copies of a system in a given state are prepared, measurements of position
and momentum will vary according to known probability
distributions; this is the fundamental postulate of quantum mechanics. We could measure the standard deviation Δx of the position measurements and
the standard deviation Δp of the momentum measurements. Then we will find that
-
where h is Planck's constant and π is Archimedes' constant. (In some treatments, the "uncertainty" of a variable is taken to be the smallest
width of a range which contains 50% of the values, which, in the case of normally distributed variables, leads to a lower bound of h/2π for the product of the
uncertainties.) Note that this inequality allows for several possibilities: the state could be such that x can be
measured with high precision, but then p will only approximately be known, or conversely p could be sharply
defined while x cannot be precisely determined. In yet other states, both x and p can be measured with
"reasonable" (but not arbitrarily high) precision.
In everyday life, we don't observe these uncertainties because the value of h is extremely small.
Generalized uncertainty principle
The uncertainty principle does not just apply to position and momentum. In its general form, it applies to every pair of
conjugate variables. Two variables are conjugate if the associated operators do not commute. An example of a pair of
conjugate variables is the x-component of angular momentum
(spin) vs. the y-component of angular momentum. In general, and
unlike the case of position versus momentum discussed above, the lower bound for the product of the uncertainties of two
conjugate variables depends on the state the system is in. The uncertainty principle becomes then a theorem in the theory of
operators (see functional analysis). The uncertainty
principle also applies to the pair of variables time and energy, but the mathematical treatment of this case differs somewhat
from the operator approach mentioned above. The full Heisenberg uncertainty relation is the following:
-
where
- A and B are two observables,
- and their corresponding operators,
- denotes the commutator of and ,
- denotes averaging
for the state , and
- is the standard deviation of X for state .
This relation, which is readily obtained as a consequence of the Cauchy-Bunyakovski-Schwarz inequality, was first pointed out in 1930 by Howard Percy Robertson and
(independently) by Erwin Schrödinger. It is therefore known as
the Robertson-Schrödinger relation. It may be evaluated not only for pairs of conjugate operators (e.g.
those defining measurements of distance and of momentum, or of duration and of
energy) but generally for any pair of Hermitian operators. There is also an uncertainty relation between the field strength and the number of particles
which is responsible for the phenomenon of virtual particles.
Important conditions in the derivation of the uncertainty relation, involving operators and , and state are, that the average values and as well as the corresponding standard
deviations ΔψA and ΔψB can actually be evaluated and exist as commensurate values.
The existence of two operators and
with a nonzero commutator, , does not contradict the
existence of an eigenstate of operator for which ΔαA =
0.
Interpretations
Main article: Interpretation of quantum mechanics
Albert Einstein was not happy with the uncertainty principle, and
he challenged Niels Bohr with a famous thought experiment: we fill a box with a radioactive material which randomly emits radiation. The
box has a shutter, which is opened and immediately thereafter shut by a clock at a precise time, thereby allowing some radiation
to escape. So the time is already known with precision. We still want to measure the conjugate variable energy precisely.
Einstein proposed doing this by weighing the box before and after. The equivalence between mass and energy from special relativity will allow you to determine precisely how much
energy left the box. Bohr countered as follows: should energy leave, then the now lighter box will rise slightly on the scale.
That changes the position of the clock. Thus the clock deviates from our stationary reference frame, and again by special relativity, its measurement of time will be different from ours,
leading to some unavoidable margin of error. In fact, a detailed analysis shows that the imprecision is correctly given by
Heisenberg's relation.
Within the widely but not universally accepted Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, the uncertainty principle is taken to mean that
on an elementary level, the physical universe does not exist in a deterministic form—but rather as a collection of
probabilities, or potentials. For example, the pattern (probability distribution) produced by millions of photons passing through
a diffraction slit can be calculated using quantum mechanics, but the exact path of each photon cannot be predicted by any known
method. The Copenhagen interpretation holds that
it cannot be predicted by any method.
It is this interpretation that Einstein was questioning when he said "I cannot believe that God would choose to play dice with
the universe." Bohr, who was one of the authors of the Copenhagen interpretation responded, "Einstein, don't tell God what to
do".
Einstein was convinced that this interpretation was in error. His reasoning was that all previously known probability
distributions arose from deterministic events. The distribution of a flipped coin or a rolled dice can be described with a
probability distribution (50% heads, 50% tails). But this does not mean that their physical motions are unpredictable.
Ordinary mechanics can be used to calculate exactly how each coin will land, if the forces acting on it are known. And the
heads/tails distribution will still line up with the probability distribution (given random initial forces).
Einstein assumed that there are similar hidden
variables in quantum mechanics which underly the observed probabilities.
Neither Einstein or anyone since has been able to construct a satisfying hidden variable theory, and the Bell inequality illustrates some very thorny issues in trying to do so.
Although the behavior of an individual particle is random, they are also correlated with the behavior of other particles.
Therefore, if the uncertainty principle is the result of some deterministic process, it must be the case that particles at great
distances instantly transmit information to each other to ensure that the correlations in behavior between particles occur.
In some situations the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is called the Heisenberg indeterminacy principle. See: Quantum indeterminacy.
External links
|