- This article covers the Christian views on the Trinity. For other uses of trinity,
please see the disambiguation page. This entry
refers to the religious, spiritual, or philosophical uses of the word.
The Holy Trinity is God, according to the doctrine of God taught in Eastern Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism,
especially since the Council of Nicea (A.D. 325), and in most Protestant traditions. The word,
Trinity, refers to the three persons (also known as hypostases) who, according to these traditions, are the single God: Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
Introduction
The Trinity is a central doctrine of most branches of Christianity; it says that God is one God, existing in three distinct persons, usually referred to as Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Historically, this has been described by the Nicene (325 A.D.), Apostles' (200 A.D.), and Athanasian Creeds
(c. 500 A.D.) although it is not explicitly described in the New
Testament. These creeds were created and endorsed by the orthodox, catholic Church of the third and fourth
centuries in reaction to heretical notions, some involving the nature of the Trinity. The creeds have been retained in some form
by most Protestants.
The Nicene Creed, which is a classic formulation of this doctrine, used
"homoousia" (Gk. of same substance) to define the relationship among the members of
the Godhead. The spelling of this word differs by a single Greek letter, "one iota", from the word used by non-trinitarians at
the time, "homoiousia", (of similar substance): a fact which has since become proverbial, representing the deep
divisions occasioned by seemingly small imprecisions, especially in theology.
Scripture and tradition
The word, Trinity, literally means, "a unity of three". This word does not appear in the Bible, and indeed, it apparently did not exist until Tertullian
coined the term in the early third century. Nevertheless, although
trinitarian Christians grant that the modern words and formulas are later developments, they still believe that this doctrine is
found systematically throughout the Bible, and in the creeds and doctrines, and in other traditions of the Christian Church. It
is considered a biblical doctrine "only on the principle that the sense of Scripture is Scripture". [1]
Belief in God as a Trinity is considered essential by Eastern
Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism, and orthodox Protestantism. However, Christian faith does not ask for comprehension:
it must be understood that God is a Trinity, for the sake of knowing who God is, and for understanding the
salvation he has accomplished. Beyond such practical issues, speculation regarding a theory of the divine being is not
necessarily encouraged. The believer does not need to know how it is that God is a Trinity; and in fact, that issue is
more often taught in terms of what the Trinity is not, distinguishing the doctrine from the many alternatives.
Baptism as the practical starting point
In practice, what a Christian begins to learn about the Trinity starts with Christian Baptism. This is also the starting point to apprehend why the doctrine matters to so many Christians, even though
what the doctrine teaches about the being of God is beyond complete comprehension. The Apostles' Creed, for example, has been commonly used as a brief summation of Trinitarian Christian faith,
to be professed by converts to Christianity when they receive baptism, and at other times in the liturgy of the church.
Christians are baptized "In the name of the Father, and of the
Son, and of the Holy Spirit" (Matt 28:19). Christian life, and the Christian understanding of salvation, begins with a declaration of the Trinity. Basil the Great (A.D. 330-379) explains:
- "We are bound to be baptized in the terms we have received, and to profess faith in the terms in which we have been
baptized"
At the baptism of Jesus Christ, the Trinity appears: "And when Jesus was
baptized, he went up immediately from the water, and behold, the heavens were opened and he saw the Spirit of God descending like
a dove, and alighting on him; and lo, a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased."
(Matthew 3:16-17, RSV). To trinitarians the three persons of the Trinity were made manifest at once, in connection with
baptism.
"This is the Faith of our baptism", the First Council of Constantinople declared (A.D.
382), "that teaches us to believe in the Name of the Father, of the Son and of the Holy
Spirit. According to this Faith there is one Godhead, Power, and Being of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit".
Christian Life and the Trinity
This singleness of God's being, and mysterious multiplicity of persons, accounts for the nature of Christian salvation, and
discloses the gift of eternal life. "Through the Son we have access to the Father in one Spirit" (Eph 2:18). This communion with
the Father is the goal of the Christian faith, and is eternal life. It is achieved through God's union with human nature, in
Jesus Christ who although fully God, humanly died for sinners to purchase their redemption; and this forgiveness and friendship
with God is made accessible through the gift to the church of the Holy Spirit, who raised Christ from the dead, and who, being
God, knows God intimately and leads and empowers the Christian to fulfill the will of God. Thus, this doctrine touches on every
aspect of the trinitarian Christian's faith and life; and that accounts for why it has been so earnestly contended for,
throughout Christian history, despite the difficulty inherent in explaining the doctrine.
One God
God is a single being. The Hebrew Bible lifts this one article of faith
above others, and surrounds it with stern warnings against departure from this central issue of faith, and of faithfulness to the
covenant God had made with them. "Hear O Israel! The Lord our God is One God" (Deut 6:4), "You shall have no other gods" (Deut
5:7) and, "This is what the LORD says- Israel's King and Redeemer, the LORD Almighty: I am the first and I am the last; apart
from me there is no God." (Isaiah 44:6). Any formulation of an article of faith which does not insist that God is solitary, that
divides worship between God and any other, or that imagines God coming into existence rather than being God eternally, is not
capable of directing people toward the knowledge of God, according to the trinitarian understanding of the Old Testament. The same insistence is found in the New Testament: "there is no God, but one" (1
Corinthians 8:4). The "other gods" warned against are therefore not gods at all, but unequal substitutes for God.
So, in the trinitarian view, the common conception is a profoundly mistaken one, which thinks of the Father and Christ as two separate beings. The central, and crucial affirmation of Christian faith is that
there is one savior, God, and one salvation, in Jesus Christ, to which there is access only because of the Holy Spirit. The God
of the Old is the God of the New, and alone is God.
God exists in three persons
This one God however exists in three persons, or in the Greek hypostases. God has but a single divine nature, and a single will, and is of but one substance. The Three
are co-equal and co-eternal. However, as laid out in the Athanasian
Creed, only the Father is unbegotten and non-proceeding. The Son is begotten from the Father. The Spirit proceeds from the
Father.
It is often opined that because God exists in three persons, God has always loved, and there has always existed perfectly
harmonious communion between the three persons of the Trinity. One consequence of this teaching is that God could not have
created Man in order to have someone to talk to or to love: God "already" enjoyed personal communion; being
perfect, He did not create Man because of any lack or inadequacy He had. Thus we find God saying in Genesis, "Let us make man in
our image".
Mutually indwelling
A rather difficult but useful explanation of the interrelationship of the separate persons of God is called
perichoresis, which means, envelopment (taken woodenly the Gk. says,
"dancing around"). This concept refers for its basis to the Gospel of
John, 14-17, where Jesus is instructing the disciples concerning the meaning of his departure. His going to the Father, he
says, is for their sake; so that he might come to them when the "other comforter" is given to them. At that time, he says, his
disciples will dwell in him, as he dwells in the Father, and the Father dwells in him, and the Father will dwell in them. This is
so, according to the theory of perichoresis, because the persons of the Trinity "reciprocally contain one another, so that one
permanently envelopes and is permanently enveloped by, the other whom he yet envelopes." (Hilary, Concerning the Trinity, 3:1).
This co-indwelling may be helpful in illustrating the trinitarian conception of salvation. The first doctrinal benefit is that
it effectively excludes the idea that God has parts. Trinitarians affirm that God is a simple, not an aggregate, being. God is
not parcelled out into three portions. The second doctrinal benefit, is that it harmonizes well with the doctrine that, the
Christian's union with the Son in his humanity brings him into union with one who contains in himself the fullness (not a part)
of deity (See also: Theosis). Perichoresis provides an intuitive figure of
what this might mean. The Son, the eternal Word, is from all eternity the dwelling place of God; he is, himself, the "Father's
house", just as the Son dwells in the Father and the Spirit; so that, when the Spirit is "given", then it happens as Jesus said,
"I will not leave you as orphans; for I will come to you".
Eternal generation and procession
Some of the most difficult language in trinitarianism, is the affirmation that the Son is "begotten" and the Spirit
"proceeds", but the Father is "neither begotten nor proceeding". The argument over whether the Spirit proceeds from the Father
alone, or the Father and Son was one of the catalysts of the Great
Schism concerning the Filioque clause in the Nicene Creed.
The difficulties of this language are evident in the timefulness of the terms, where no beginning, change in being, or process
within time is intended. The Son is begotten, and the Spirit proceeds, eternally. Augustine of Hippo explains, "Your years are one day, and Your day is not daily, but today; because Your
today yields not with tomorrow, for neither does it follow yesterday. Your today is eternity; therefore You begat the Co-eternal,
to whom You said, 'This day have I begotten Thee.' ".
Economic versus Ontological Trinity
Economical subordination is implied by the genitive of terms like "Father of", "Son of", and "Spirit of". While
orthodox trinitarianism rejects ontological subordination, it affirms that the Father has a monarchial relation
to which the Son and Spirit are subject. Or, in other terms, it is from the Father that the mission of the Breath and Word
originate: whatever God does, it is the Father that does it, and always through the Son, by the Spirit. The Father is seen as the
"source" or "fountainhead" from which the Son is begotten and the Spirit proceeds, much as one might observe water bubbling out
of a spring without worrying about when it began doing so. However, this language is hemmed in with qualifications so severe that
the analogy in view is easily lost, and is a source of perpetual controversy.
Nevertheless, the concept is considered to be of momentous practical importance to the Christian life because, again, it
points to the nature of the Christian's reconciliation with God. The excruciatingly fine distinctions can issue in grand
differences of emphasis in worship and government, as large as the difference between East and West, which for generations now
have been considered practically insurmountable.
- Economic Trinity: When describing the acts of the triune God with respect to the creation, history, salvation, our daily
lives, etc, we describe the Economic Trinity. This refers to how the Trinity operates within history as we think of the roles or
functions performed by each of the persons of the Trinity.
- Ontological Trinity: This speaks of the essence (John 1:1-2), nature or attributes of the Trinity.
Or more simply - the ontological Trinity (who God is) and the economic Trinity (what God does). The economic reflects and reveals
the ontological. The members of the trinity are equal ontologically, but not economically. In other words, the trinity is not
symmetrical in terms of function, nor in relationship to one another. The roles of each differ both among themselves, and in
relationship to creation. Furthermore, the trinity is not symmetrical with regards to origin. The Son is begotten from the Father
(John 3:16). The Spirit proceeds from the Father (John 15:26). Only the Father is neither begotten nor proceeding. (See Athanasian Creed).
Son begotten, yet uncreated
The church's understanding of how the Son can be begotten and yet uncreated lies in the distinction drawn between the
substance of created things, and the substance of deity. Because the Son is begotten, not made, the substance of his person is
that of Yahweh, of deity. The creation is brought into being through
the Son, but the Son himself is no part of it.
The church fathers used a number of analogies to express this thought. Irenaeus was the final major theologian of the second
century. He writes "the Father is God, and the Son is God, for whatever is begotten of God is God".
Justin Martyr says "just as we see also happening in the case of a fire, which is not lessened when it has kindled another,
but remains the same; and that which has been kindled by it likewise appears to exist by itself, not diminishing that from which
it was kindled. The Word of Wisdom, who is Himself this God begotten of the Father of all things."
Tertullian says "We have been taught that He proceeds forth from God, and in that procession He is generated; so that He is
the Son of God, and is called God from unity of substance with God. For God, too, is a Spirit. Even when the ray is shot from the
sun, it is still part of the parent mass; the sun will still be in the ray, because it is a ray of the sun-there is no division
of substance, but merely an extension. Thus Christ is Spirit of Spirit, and God of God, as light of light is kindled."
However, any attempt to explain the mystery to some extent must break down, and has limited usefulness. The difference in
thinking between those who believe in the Trinity, and those who do not, is not an issue of understanding the mystery. Rather,
the difference is one of belief concerning the personal identity of Christ. It is a difference in conception of the salvation
connected with Christ, that drives all reactions, either favorable or unfavorable, to the doctrine of the Holy Trinity. As it is,
the doctrine of the Trinity is directly an issue of Christology.
Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant distinctions
The Western (Roman Catholic) tradition is more prone
to make positive statements concerning the inter-relationship of persons in the Trinity. It should be noted that explanations of
the Trinity are not the same thing as the doctrine itself; nevertheless the Augustinian west is inclined to think in
philosophical terms concerning the rationality of God's being, and is prone on this basis to be more open than the East, to seek
formulations which make the doctrine more intelligible.
For example, one explanation is based on deductive assumptions of logical necessity: which hold that God is necessarily a
Trinity. On this view, the Son is the Father's perfect conception of his own self. Since existence is among the Father's
perfections, his self-conception must also exist. Since the Father is one, there can be but one perfect self-conception: the Son.
Thus the Son is begotten by the Father in an act of intellectual generation. By contrast, the Holy Spirit proceeds from the perfect love that exists between the Father and the
Son: and as in the case of the Son, this love must share the perfection of real existence. Therefore, as reflected in the
filioque clause inserted into the Nicene Creed by the Roman Catholic Church, the Holy Spirit is said to proceed from both the Father "and the
Son." The Eastern Orthodox church holds that the filioque clause,
i.e., the added words "and the Son" (in Latin, filioque), constitutes heresy. One reason for this is that it undermines
the personhood of the Holy Spirit; is there not also perfect love between the Father and the Holy Spirit, and if so, would this
love not also share the perfection of real existence? At this rate, there were would be an infinite number of persons of the
Godhead, unless some persons were subordinate so that their love were less perfect and therefore need not share the perfection of
real existence.
Most Protestant groups that use the creed also include the filioque clause. However, the issue is usually not controversial
among them because, their conception is generally less exact than is discussed above. The clause is often understood by
Protestants to mean that the Spirit is sent from the Father, by the Son - a conception which is not controversial in Catholicism
or Orthodoxy, either. Protestantism is harder to describe however, because of its lack of a unified tradition. The Protestant
religious climate, which generally eschews any appeal to tradition, makes it more likely that rejected alternatives to
Trinitarianism will be revisited. In some cases these alternatives have been formally adopted, which the Roman Catholic (and its
appendages) and Orthodox churches have rejected as heresies, including a practical tri-theism (the distinction of persons implies
a distinction in being), Nestorianism (a distinction in Christ's natures
implies a distinction in persons), Sabellianism (or Modalism, the oneness of God implies singleness of person revealed in different ways at
various times), and Arianism (hero-adoration of Jesus, as opposed to religious
worship of God alone, and of Christ as God incarnate, and of the Spirit as the presence of God within the believer), etc. In
those cases where such alternatives are formally adopted, as opposed to being mistakenly substituted for orthodoxy, Protestantism
drops identification with those groups, in effect upholding the trinitarian tradition as a biblical doctrine.
Historical development
Because Christianity converts cultures from within, the doctrinal formulas as they have developed bear the marks of the ages
through which the church has passed. The rhetorical tools of secular philosophy, especially of Neoplatonism, are evident in the language adopted to explain the church's rejection of Arianism, Sabellianism, Adoptionism, etc. Augustine of Hippo has been noted at the forefront of these formulations; and he contributed much to the
speculative development of the doctrine of the Trinity as it is known today, in the West; the Cappadocian Fathers (John Chrysostom,
Basil the Great, and Gregory Nazianzus) are more prominent in the East. The imprint of Augustinianism is found, for example,
in the western Athanasian Creed, which, although it bears the name
and reproduces the views of the fourth century opponent of Arianism, was probably written much later.
These controversies were for most purposes settled at the Ecumenical councils, whose creeds affirm the doctrine of the Trinity. Constantine the Great who called the first of these councils, in
AD 325, arguably had political motives for settling the issue rather than religious reasons; as he personally favored the Arian
party, which in politically key regions of the Empire held a majority over the Catholics. It was also the form of Christianity
that had been adopted by northern tribes of Vandals, and it would have given Constantine an advantage in defense against them, if
the council adopted the same faith. It was not to be. The arguments of the deacon Athanasius prevailed; and over the next three hundred years, the Arians were gradually converted
to Catholicism.
According to the Athanasian Creed, each of these three divine Persons are said to be eternal, each said to be almighty, none
greater or less than another, each said to be God, and yet together being but one God. According to the teachings of orthodox
Christianity, the three persons of the Holy Trinity are said to share one Divine Nature, thus preserving their belief in one God.
So are we forbidden by the catholic religion to say; There are three Gods or three Lords. -- Athanasian Creed, line
20
Some opponents of this view contend that these three "Persons" are not separate and distinct individuals. The modalists attempted to resolve the mystery of the Trinity by holding that, while God is
numerically one, the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost are merely modes, roles, or manifestations of God Almighty. These titles
describe how humanity has interacted with or had experiences with God. In the Role of The Father, God is the provider and creator
of all. In the mode of The Son, man experiences God in the flesh, as a human, fully man and fully God. God manifests Himself as
the Holy Spirit by his actions on Earth and within the lives of Christians. This view is known as Sabellianism, and was rejected as heresy by the Ecumenical
Councils although it is still prevalent today among denominations known as "Oneness" Christians. Trinitarianism insists that the Father, Son and Spirit
simultaneously exist, each fully the same God.
Some feminist theologians refer to the persons of the Holy Trinity with more
gender-neutral language, such as Creator, Redeemer, and Sustainer (or Sanctifier). This is a very recent formulation, and
emphasizes their roles rather than their personhood. Since, however, each of the three divine persons participates in the acts of
creation, redemption, and sustaining, traditional Christians reject this formulation as simply a new variety of Modalism.
The doctrine developed into its present form, precisely through this kind of confrontation with alternatives; and the process of
refinement continues in the same way. Even now, ecumenical dialogue between Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and trinitarian Protestants, seeks an expression of trinitarian
doctrine which will overcome the extremely subtle differences that divide them into separate communions. The doctrine of the
Trinity is symbolic, somewhat paradoxically, of both division and unity.
Dissent from the doctrine
Many Christians believe that the orthodox doctrine of the Trinity is so central to the Christian faith, that to deny it is to
reject the Christian faith entirely. However there have been a number of groups both historical and current which identify
themselves as Christians but do not hold the doctrine of the Trinity in any form. Some ancient sects, such as the Ebionites, said that Jesus was not a "Son of God," but rather an ordinary man who was a
prophet -- a view of Jesus shared by Islam. Many modern groups also have a nontrinitarian understanding of God. These include the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints, the Jehovah's Witnesses, Christian Science, the Unification Church, Unitarian
Universalists, and Oneness Pentecostals, among others.
These groups differ from one another in their view of God, but all alike reject the doctrine of the Trinity.
Debate over the biblical basis of the doctrine tends to revolve chiefly over the question of the deity of Jesus (see Christology). Proponents find
plurality in Old Testament details like the term "Elohim" and argue for example that Jesus accepted worship, forgave sins,
claimed oneness with the Father, and used the expression "I am" as an echo of the divine name given to Moses on Sinai. Those who
reject the teaching for their part offer different explanations, arguing among other things that Jesus also rejected being called
so little as good in deference to God (versus "the Father"), disavowed omniscience as the Son, and referred to ascending unto "my
Father, and to your Father; and to my God, and to your God." As in similar theological disputes, few are cross-persuaded and tend
as a rule to cling to the convictions they received within their own upbringings.
The teaching is also pivotal to ecumenical disagreements with two of the other major faiths, Judaism and Islam; the former
reject Jesus' divine mission entirely, the latter accepts Jesus as a human prophet subordinate to Muhammed but rejects altogether the deity of Jesus. Many within Judaism and Islam also accuse Christian
trinitarians of practicing polytheism, of believing in three gods rather than
just one.
Alleged pagan origin
Anti-trinitarian Christians have long contended that the doctrine of the Trinity is a prime example of Christian borrowing
from pagan sources. A simpler idea of God was supposedly lost very early in the history of the Church, through accommodation to
pagan ideas, and the incomprehensible doctrine of the Trinity took its place. As evidence of this process, a comparison is often
drawn between the Trinity and notions of a divine triad, found in pagan religions.
As far back as Babylonia, the worship of pagan gods grouped in threes, or
triads, was common. That influence was also prevalent in Egypt, Greece, and Rome in the centuries before, during, and after Christ. It
is alleged that, after the death of the apostles, these pagan beliefs began to invade
Christianity.
Some find a direct link between the doctrine of the Trinity, and the Egyptian theologians of Alexandria, for example. They suggest that Alexandrian theology, with its strong emphasis on the deity of
Christ, was an intermediary between the Egyptian religious heritage and Christianity.
The Catholic Church is charged with adopting these pagan tenets, invented by the Egyptians, adapted to Christian thinking by
means of Greek philosophy. As proof of this, critics of the doctrine are able to point to the widely acknowledged synthesis of
Christianity with platonic philosophy,
which is evident in Trinitarian formulas that appeared by the end of the third century. Catholic doctrine became firmly rooted in the
soil of Hellenism, it is alleged; and thus an essentially pagan idea was forcibly
imposed on the churches.
External links
|