|
In mathematics, a series is a sum of a sequence of terms. That is, a series is a list of numbers with addition operations between them, e.g,
- 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ...
which may or may not be meaningful. Series may be finite, or infinite; in
the first case they may be handled with elementary algebra, but infinite series
require tools from mathematical analysis if they are to
be applied in anything more than a tentative way.
Examples of simple series include the arithmetic series which
is a sum of an arithmetic progression, written as:
-
and finite geometric series, a sum of a geometric progression, which can be written as:
-
Infinite series
An infinite series is a sum of infinitely many terms. Such a
sum can have a finite value; if it has, it is said to converge; if it does not, it is said to diverge. The fact
that infinite series can converge resolves several of Zeno's
paradoxes.
The simplest convergent infinite series is perhaps
-
It is possible to "visualize" its convergence on the real number line: we
can imagine a line of length 2, with successive segments marked off of lengths 1, 1/2, 1/4, etc. There is always room to mark the
next segment, because the amount of line remaining is always the same as the last segment marked: when we have marked off 1/2, we
still have a piece of length 1/2 unmarked, so we can certainly mark the next 1/4. This argument does not prove that the sum is
equal to 2 (although it is), but it does prove that it is at most 2 — in other words, the series has an
upper bound.
This series is a geometric series and mathematicians usually write it as:
-
Formally, if an infinite series
-
is given with real (or complex) numbers
an, we say that the series converges towards S or that its value
is S if the limit
-
exists and is equal to S. If there is no such number, then the series is said to diverge.
Here the sequence of partial sums is defined as the
sequence
-
indexed by N. The definition is the same as saying the sequence of partial sums has limit S, as N
→ ∞.
History of the theory of infinite series
Convergence criteria
The investigation of the validity of infinite series is considered to begin with Gauss. Euler had already considered the hypergeometric series
-
on which Gauss published a memoir in 1812. It established simpler criteria of convergence, and the questions of remainders and
the range of convergence.
Cauchy (1821) insisted on strict tests of convergence; he showed that if two series
are convergent their product is not necessarily so, and with him begins the discovery of effective criteria. The terms
convergence and divergence had been introduced long before by Gregory (1668). Euler and Gauss had given various criteria, and Maclaurin had
anticipated some of Cauchy's discoveries. Cauchy advanced the theory of power
series by his expansion of a complex function
in such a form.
Abel (1826) in his memoir on the series
-
corrected certain of Cauchy's conclusions, and gave a completely scientific summation of the series for complex values of
m and x. He showed the necessity of considering the
subject of continuity in questions of convergence.
Cauchy's methods led to special rather than general criteria, and the same may be said of Raabe (1832), who made the first
elaborate investigation of the subject, of De Morgan (from 1842), whose logarithmic test DuBois-Reymond (1873) and Pringsheim
(1889) have shown to fail within a certain region; of Bertrand (1842), Bonnet (1843), Malmsten (1846, 1847, the latter without
integration); Stokes (1847), Paucker (1852), Tchebichef (1852), and Arndt (1853). General criteria began with Kummer (1835), and
have been studied by Eisenstein (1847), Weierstrass in his various contributions to the theory of functions, Dini (1867),
DuBois-Reymond (1873), and many others. Pringsheim's (from 1889) memoirs present the most complete general theory.
Uniform convergence
The theory of uniform convergence was treated by Cauchy
(1821), his limitations being pointed out by Abel, but the first to attack it successfully were Stokes and Seidel (1847-48).
Cauchy took up the problem again (1853), acknowledging Abel's criticism, and reaching the same conclusions which Stokes had
already found. Thomé used the doctrine (1866), but there was great delay in recognizing the importance of distinguishing between
uniform and non-uniform convergence, in spite of the demands of the theory of functions.
Semi-convergence
Semi-convergent series were studied by Poisson (1823), who also gave a general form for the remainder of the Maclaurin
formula. The most important solution of the problem is due, however, to Jacobi (1834), who attacked the question of the remainder
from a different standpoint and reached a different formula. This expression was also worked out, and another one given, by
Malmsten (1847). Schlömilch (Zeitschrift, Vol.I, p. 192, 1856) also improved Jacobi's remainder, and showed the relation between
the remainder and Bernoulli's function . Genocchi (1852) has further contributed to the theory.
Among the early writers was Wronski, whose "loi suprême"
(1815) was hardly recognized until Cayley (1873) brought it into prominence.
Interpolation
Interpolation formulas have been given by various writers from Newton to the present time. Lagrange's theorem is well known,
although Euler had already given an analogous form, as are also Olivier's formula (1827), and those of Minding (1830), Cauchy
(1837), Jacobi (1845), Grunert (1850, 1853), Christoffel (1858), and Mehler (1864).
Fourier series
Fourier series were being investigated as the result of physical
considerations at the same time that Gauss, Abel, and Cauchy were working out the theory of infinite series. Series for the
expansion of sines and cosines, of multiple arcs in powers of the sine and cosine of the arc had been treated by Jakob Bernoulli
(1702) and his brother Johann (1701) and still earlier by Viète. Euler and Lagrange had simplified the subject, as have, more
recently, Poinsot, Schröter, Glaisher,
and Kummer. Fourier (1807) set for himself a different problem, to expand a given
function of x in terms of the sines or cosines of multiples of x, a problem which he embodied in his Théorie analytique de la Chaleur (1822). Euler had already given the formulas for
determining the coefficients in the series; and Lagrange had passed over them without recognizing their value, but Fourier was
the first to assert and attempt to prove the general theorem. Poisson (1820-23) also attacked the problem from a different
standpoint. Fourier did not, however, settle the question of convergence of his series, a matter left for Cauchy (1826) to
attempt and for Dirichlet (1829) to handle in a thoroughly scientific manner. Dirichlet's treatment (Crelle, 1829), while
bringing the theory of trigonometric series to a temporary conclusion, has been the subject of criticism and improvement by
Riemann (1854), Heine, Lipschitz, Schläfli, and DuBois-Reymond. Among other prominent contributors to the theory of trigonometric
and Fourier series have been Dini, Hermite, Halphen, Krause, Byerly and Appell.
Some types of infinite series
- A geometric series is one where each successive term
is produced by multiplying the previous term by a constant number. Example: 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16...
- The harmonic series is
the series 1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5...
- An alternating series is a series where terms
alternate signs. Example: 1 - 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 - 1/5...
Convergence criteria
- If the series ∑ an converges, then the sequence (an)
converges to 0 for n→∞; the converse is in general not true.
- If all the numbers an are positive and ∑ bn is a convergent
series such that an ≤ bn for all n, then ∑
an converges as well. If all the bn are positive,
an ≥ bn for all n and ∑
bn diverges, then ∑ an diverges as well.
- If the an are positive and there exists a constant C < 1 such that
an+1/an ≤ C, then ∑
an converges.
- If the an are positive and there exists a constant C < 1 such that
(an)1/n ≤ C, then ∑ an
converges.
- Integral test: if
f(x) is a positive monotone decreasing
function defined on the interval [1, ∞) with
f(n) = an for all n, then ∑ an
converges if and only if the integral ∫1∞
f(x) dx is finite.
- A series of the form ∑ (-1)n an (with an
≥ 0) is called alternating. Such a series converges if the sequence
an is monotone decreasing and
converges towards 0. The converse is in general not true.
- See ratio test.
Examples
The series
-
converges if r > 1 and diverges for r ≤ 1, which can be shown with the integral criterion 5) from
above. As a function of r, the sum of this series is Riemann's zeta function.
The geometric series
-
converges if and only if |z| < 1.
The telescoping series
-
converges if the sequence bn converges to a limit
L as n goes to infinity. The value of the series is then b1 - L.
Absolute convergence
The sum
-
is said to converge absolutely if the series of absolute values
-
converges. In this case, the original series, and all reorderings of it, converge, and converge towards the same sum.
If a series converges, but not absolutely, then one can always find a reordering of the terms so that the reordered series
diverges. Even more: if the an are real and S is any real number, one can find a reordering
so that the reordered series converges with limit S (Riemann).
Power series
Several important functions can be represented as Taylor series; these
are infinite series involving powers of the independent variable and are also called power series. See also radius of
convergence.
Historically, mathematicians such as Leonhard Euler operated
liberally with infinite series, even if they were not convergent. When calculus was put on a sound and correct foundation in the
nineteenth century, rigorous proofs of the convergence of series were always required. However, the formal operation with
non-convergent series has been retained in rings of formal power
series which are studied in abstract algebra. Formal power
series are also used in combinatorics to describe and study sequences that are otherwise difficult to handle; this is the method of generating functions.
Generalizations
The notion of series can be defined in every abelian topological group; the most commonly encountered case is that of series
in a Banach space.
There is no serious definition for an infinite sum over an uncountable
set. For example if X is a set and f a function on X taking non-negative real values, such that
-
for any countable subset Y of X, with A an absolute constant, it follows that
f(x) = 0 for all x outside some countable subset of X. In other words, infinite sums of
uncountably many non-negative reals make sense only in the case that this is a conventional convergent infinite series, extended
by the value 0 to an uncountable set.
Asymptotic series, otherwise asymptotic expansions, are not typically convergent infinite
series, but sequences of finite approximations each of which is a good asymptotic representation.
|