|
Quantum mind is the belief that large-scale quantum coherence is necessary to understanding the mind and
brain.
This is very much a minority opinion, although it does have the support of the well-known mathematical physicist Roger Penrose. Other proponents include Stuart Hameroff, Karl Pribram, and Henry Stapp. The argument for quantum mind
is the argument that classical mechanics cannot explain
consciousness.
It also has the support of Michael Lockwood and Brian Flanagan, and of Neils Bohr, the father of quantum mechanics.
The main argument against the quantum mind is that the brain is warm, wet, and noisy and that the structures of the brain are
much too large for quantum mechanics to be important. Consequently, it is difficult for coherent quantum states to form for very
long in the brain, and impossible for them to exist at the scales on the order of the size of neurons. These issues have led
Penrose to argue that consciousness is not a consequence of interactions between neurons in the brain but arises as from microtubules within cells, which are much smaller and for which quantum effects could be significant.
On the other hand, a system does not cease to be quantum because it is wet and noisy. And then, what was previously dismissed
as "noise" in the brain has recently been discovered to be complex signals.
Consequently, it is difficult for coherent quantum states to form for very long in the brain, and impossible for them to exist
at the scales on the order of the size of neurons. These issues have led Penrose to argue that consciousness is not a consequence
of interactions between neurons in the brain
but arises as from microtubules within cells, which are much smaller and for
which quantum effects could be significant.
Then again, if the brain is fractal in character, it may well exhibit sensitive dependence on initial (quantum) conditions.
Given the fractal character of dendritic arborizations, brain function may depend on self-similar processes at lower
spatio-temporal scales. Or, neural form follows quantum function. If all matter consists of quantum fields, as Dyson makes
explicit in his Scientific American article on "Field Theory," then the brain just is a collection of such fields.
This view is very different from conventional views of how the brain works, in which neurons communicate via electric impluses
which trigger the release of neurotransmitters in the synapses. In the conventional view of brain function, microtubules play no significant role
in brain function other than to provide structural support to the neurons. The theory of the quantum mind has been criticized on
a number of grounds. For one, it fails to explain how chemicals and physical processes which effect neuron functioning would
cause generally predictable changes in consciousness, whereas the conventional theory provides an explanation for how
psychoactive substances work and how the brain would react to injury. In addition, microtubules are found in all cells, not just
neurons, and no reason has been given why consciousness should be influenced by neuron microtubules, and not those in other parts
of the body.
Lockwood, Stapp, and Flanagan have argued that the rich state space of quantum theory easily accomodates the variety
perceptual state spaces, whereas classical theory cannot.
Also, decoherence mechanisms such as emission
of thermal radiation
appear to apply to large molecules such as microtubule protein subunits and synaptic vesicle proteins, making quantum
coherence on the size scale proposed for quantum mind theories unlikely.
Quantum theories of mind are one of the few classes of theories acceptable in the philsophical stances of pseudonomenalism and mind/brain identity theory.
See also: Quantum indeterminacy, David Bohm
Useful references
- Bohm, David. Quantum Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1951.
- Flanagan, Brian. "Are Perceptual Fields Quantum Fields?"
- Lockwood, Michael. Mind, Brain and the Quantum. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell Ltd., 1989.
- Schrodinger, Erwin. Mind & Matter, Mind and Matter. Cambridge University Press, 1959.
- Weyl, Hermann. Mind and Nature, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1934.
- Wigner, Eugene. "Physics and the Explanation of Life," in Foundations of Physics, vol. 1, 1970, pp. 34-45.
|