Home Home  Article Index Article Index  
GuruPedia  

Project for the New American Century

This page is protected from editing until disputes have been resolved on the discussion page.
The protection of this particular version of the page is not meant to express support or endorsement; users may want to review the discussion page for this article or compare different versions from the page history.

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) is an American right-wing think tank. It was established in the spring of 1997 as a non-profit, educational organization whose goal is to promote American global leadership. It is based in the same building as the American Enterprise Institute in Washington DC.

The PNAC is quite controversial, and has raised the concern of many because it can be viewed as proposing military and economic domination of land, space, and cyberspace by the United States, so as to establish American dominance in world affairs for the indefinite future—hence, "the New American Century".

The chairman of PNAC is William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard magazine. Present and former members include Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush, Richard Perle, Richard Armitage, Dick Cheney, Lewis Libby, William J. Bennett, Gary Schmitt, Zalmay Khalilzad, and Ellen Bork, the wife of Judge Robert Bork. A large number of its ideas and its members are associated with the hawkish neoconservative school of political theory, although the majority of its members are not affiliated with any branch of service. PNAC has seven full-time staff members, in addition to its board of directors.

Table of contents

Content

The Project is an initiative of the New Citizenship Project, a non-profit 501c3 organization that is funded by the Bradley Foundation [1] . The PNAC declares itself to be dedicated to the fundamental propositions that

  • American leadership is good both for America and for the world;
  • Such leadership requires military strength, diplomatic energy, and commitment to moral principle;
  • Too few political leaders today are making the case for global leadership;

The group states that when diplomacy has failed, military action is an acceptable and necessary resort. PNAC advocates the installation of permanent military bases around the world for the establishment of a United States Global Constabulary. This global police force would have the power to keep law and order around the world in accordance with rules that the United States would establish as being proper and just. It also advocates the United States government should capitalize on its military and economic superiority to gain unchallengeable superiority through all means necessary, including military force.

The PNAC and its members had long called for the United States to abandon the ABM Treaty. The PNAC also proposes to control the new "international commons" of space and "cyberspace" and pave the way for the creation of a new military service - U.S. Space Forces - with the mission of space control. In 1998, Rumsfeld chaired a bipartisan commission on the US Ballistic Missile Threat towards advancement of these goals.

In September 2000, the PNAC issued a 80-page report entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, And Resources For A New Century . The report has been the subject of much analysis and criticism.

Controversy

Critics of the PNAC argue that it represents a broad, borderline imperial agenda of global US military expansionism and dominance that is currently being enacted by the Bush Administration. Supporters of the PNAC argue that the project's advocated policies are not fundamentally different than what have been long been proposed by other conservative foreign policy analyists, and that the PNAC is the target of unfair conspiracy theories. Much of the basis for its critics' arguments is derived from the text of Rebuilding America's Defenses. Critics often refer to a number of quotes from this report to support their position. PNAC critics suggest that portions of the document call into question the true motives behind the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Another issue pointed to in support of the critics' position stems back to March of 1992 when an internal Pentagon report entitled Defense Policy Guidance (DPG) was leaked to The New York Times. This is significant because the authors of that document -- Pentagon national security consultants at the time -- both went on to be members of the PNAC and, as mentioned below, key figures in the present Bush Administration: Paul Wolfowitz and I. Lewis Libby. When the document was leaked, there was a massive outcry, and it was soon denounced by Democratic Senator Joseph Biden as a blueprint for "literally a Pax Americana". (see Barton Gellman, “Keeping the U.S. First; Pentagon Would Preclude a Rival Superpower,” The Washington Post, 11 March 1992, p. 1.)

Bush Administration

With the election of George W. Bush, many of PNAC's members were appointed to key positions within the new President's administration:

Other Members

See also

  • Committee for the Liberation of Iraq

External links

Analysis of PNAC



Popular Topics

This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.  For the live article, click here.

Privacy