|
The Nuremberg Trials is the general name for two sets of trials of Nazis involved in World War II and the Holocaust. The trials were held in the German city of Nuremberg (Nürnberg) from 1945 to 1949 at the Nuremberg Palace of Justice (the only court in Germany large enough to host the event that had
not been destroyed by Allied bombing). The first and most famous of these trials was
the Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal or IMT, which tried twenty-four
of the most important captured (or still believed to be alive) leaders of Nazi Germany. It was held from November 20, 1945 to October 1, 1946. The second set of trials were of lesser war
criminals under Control Council Law No. 10, including the famous Doctors'
Trial. The majority of this page deals with the IMT.
Creation of the court
At the meetings in Teheran (1943), Yalta (1945) and Potsdam (1945), the three major wartime powers USA, USSR and Britain agreed on
the format to punish those responsible for war-crimes during World War II.
France was also awarded a place on the tribunal.
The legal basis for the trial was established by the 'London Charter', issued on August 8, 1945. Some 200 German war crimes defendants were tried at
Nuremberg, and 1,600 others were tried under the traditional channels of military justice.
Location
The Soviet Union had wanted the trials to take place in Berlin, however Nuremberg was chosen as the site for the trials for specific reasons:
- convenient location in the American sector (at this time, Germany was divided up
into four sectors)
- the Palace of Justice was spacious and largely undamaged. A large prison was also part of the complex
- because Nuremberg had been appointed "City of the party rallies",
there was symbolic value in making it the place of the party's demise.
It was also agreed that Berlin would become the permanent seat of the IMT and that the first trial (several were planned)
would take place in Nuremberg. Because of the Cold War there were no subsequent
trials.
Participants
Each of the four countries provided one judge and an alternate; and the prosecutors. The judges were:
- Geoffrey Lawrence (British main and president)
- Norman Birkett (British alternate)
- Francis Biddle (US main)
- John Parker (US alternate)
- Henri de Vabre (French main)
- Robert Falco (French alternate)
- Iola Nikitchenko (Russian main)
- Alexander Volchkov (Russian alternate)
The chief American prosecutor was Robert H. Jackson. The chief British prosecutor was Hartley Shawcross.
The validity of the court
The defendants were not allowed to complain about the selection of judges. Some people argue that, because of this, the
Tribunal was not impartial and could not be regarded as a court in the true sense. The trial, allegedly, had all the trappings of
a kangaroo court. A.L. Goodheart, Professor at Oxford, refuted this view, writing:
- "Attractive as this argument may sound in theory, it ignores the fact that it runs counter to the administration of law in
every country. If it were true then no spy could be given a legal trial, because his case is always heard by judges representing
the enemy country. Yet no one has ever argued that in such cases it was necessary to call on neutral judges. The prisoner has the
right to demand that his judges shall be fair, but not that they shall be neutral. As Lord Writ has pointed out, the same
principle is applicable to ordinary criminal law because 'a burglar cannot complain that he is being tried by a jury of honest
citizens." The Legality of the Nuremberg Trials, Juridical Review, April
1946
The main Soviet judge, Nikitchenko, had taken part in Stalin's show trials of
1936-38, something which in later years may have damaged the credibility of the Nuremberg trials. The trials were conducted under
their own rules of evidence; the indictments were created ex post
facto and were not based on any nation's law; the tu quoque defense was removed; and the entire spirit of the assembly was "victor's justice". All this did little to help the credibility of trials.
But the spirit of the time was well reflected at Nuremberg - a long, brutal and extraordinarily costly war had been fought and
the surviving leaders of the losing side could not expect to simply walk away from the disaster they had created. War crimes of
the allied countries such as massive bombings of civilians were never tried.
The main trial
Defendants in the dock - Front row: Göring, Hess, von Ribbentrop, and Keitel. Second row: Dönitz, Raeder, Schirach,
Sauckel.
The International Military Tribunal was opened on October 18, 1945, in the Supreme Court Building in Berlin. The first
session was presided over by the Soviet judge, Nikitchenko. The prosecution entered indictments against 24 major war criminals
and six "criminal organizations" - the leadership of the Nazi party, the SS and SD, the Gestapo, the SA and the High Command of the German army
(OKW). The indictments were for:
- Conspiracy to commit crimes against peace
- Planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression
- War crimes
- Crimes against humanity
The twenty-four accused were:
- "I" indicted
- "G" indicted and found guilty
- "=" Not Charged
The definition of what constitutes a war crime is described by the Nuremberg Principles, a document which was created as a result of the trial. The medical
experiments conducted by German doctors led to the creation of the Nüremberg code to control future trials involving human subjects, and the so-called Doctors' Trial.
Influence on the development of international criminal law
The Nuremberg trials had a great influence on the development of international criminal law. The International
Law Commission, acting on the request of the United Nations General Assembly, produced in 1950 the
report Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the
Tribunal (Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1950, vol. III). The influence of the tribunal can also be seen in
the proposals for a permanent international criminal court, and the drafting of international criminal codes, later prepared by
the International Law Commission.
The Nuremberg trials initiated a movement for the prompt establishment of a permanent international criminal court, eventually
leading over fifty years later to the adoption of the Statute of the International Criminal Court.
See also
External links
|