- This article is about law in society. For other article subjects named law
see law (disambiguation). For the legal paper size, see
Paper size.
This article is concerned with laws of politics and jurisprudence: rules of conduct which mandate and/or proscribe specified relationships among people and organizations; as well as punishments for those who do not follow the established
rules of conduct.
In ethics and moral philosophy
this type of law is often called a "human legal code" to distinguish it from
more fundamental laws applicable to all beings (metaphysics, ontology). Such a body of laws can be seen as a legally-enforced ethical code or as a "secular moral
code" (to the degree that political leaders replace religious leaders as moral examples). Because lawyers and jurists more than other professions are self-regulating, almost by
definition, they are often held to higher standards of behaviour or at least a stricter etiquette. These concerns are not part of this article, because those expectations and disciplines are specific
to each legal code. This article takes an English-speaking point of view and
deals with other legal traditions and codes by way of comparison only.
Jurisprudence
Jurisprudence refers to two different things. First, in common law
jurisdictions, it means simply "case law", i.e. the law that is established through
the decisions of the courts and other officials. Second, it means the philosophy of law, or legal theory, which studies
not what the law is in a particular jurisdiction (say, Turkey or the United States) but law in general--i.e. those attributes
common to all legal systems.
Jurisprudence in the second sense is conventionally divided into two parts: descriptive, or analytic, jurisprudence, and
normative
jurisprudence. Analytic jurisprudence studies what law 'is', normative jurisprudence studies what law 'ought to
be'.
Among the most important questions of analytic jurisprudence are these: What is a law? What is a legal system? What is the relationship between law and power? What is the relationship between law and justice or morality? Does every society have a
legal system? How should we understand concepts like legal rights and legal obligations or duties? The most influential works of analytic jurisprudence include: Jeremy Bentham, Of Laws in General;
Hans Kelsen, The Pure Theory of
Law, H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law, and
Ronald Dworkin, Law's Empire.
Among the most important questions of normative jurisprudence are these: What is the proper function of law? What sorts of acts should be subject to punishment, and what sorts of punishment should be permitted? What is justice? What rights do we have? Is there
a duty to obey the law? What value has the rule of law? The most influential
works of normative jurisprudence include all the classics of political philosophy. Among contemporary writers, the following have been
particularly influential: John Rawls, A Theory of Justice H.L.A. Hart,
Punishment and Responsibility; Joel
Feinberg, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law; Joseph Raz, The Morality of
Freedom; Ronald Dworkin, A Matter of
Principle
Codification of law
Law is the formal codification of customs which have achieved such acceptance as become the enforced norm. The process of acceptance is accelerated by
the existence of legislative bodies which seek to impose laws.
Law codification involves the legislation and regulation of statutes; as well as the resolution of disputes. In the civil law system codification is also an attempt to structure the law according to fundamental ethical principles to create a sense of order and simplicity that all members of society can
comprehend, not merely university trained jurists. Stating the law in simple, precise
terms, understandable to the lay person without a specialized legal education, is the only way they can reasonably obey it or be
fairly sanctioned for not obeying it.
This overlaps with the idea of a formal social legal code as understood in
ethics. This may be understandable to the educated lay person but perhaps not to the
ordinary lay person. For example, one can explain the idea of precedent more
easily than that of the reasonable man, but it may be much harder to
explain why precedent is "fair" to one without "higher education". The following are examples of such lay explanations of different branches of law,
and theories of law.
Law as academic discipline and profession
In addition to being part of the societal framework law is also an academic discipline and a profession. Lawyers are sometimes called by other names, as in
England where the profession is divided between solicitors and barristers. Sometimes they are also called
notaries. (Do not confuse this term with notary public which is an individual who is licensed to act as a witness to
certain transactions, take oaths and authenticate signatures.) They are professionally trained in the United States at graduate schools of law leading to the
J.D. degree (Juris Doctor). In other countries legal education is considered to start at
the undergraduate stage taught in faculty of law leading to the LL.B. or B.C.L. degrees. NOTE: In Canada at least, the LL.B. requires a previous undergraduate degree to study. Law is an
undergraduate degree mainly in civil law countries. Most of these schools also have advanced legal degrees such as the LL.M. and the J.S.D. degrees. Many persons who attend law school never practice law but use their knowledge of law in another
profession. See Law (academic) and jurisprudence For law as a profession, see lawyer, jurist and practice of law.
Further discussion
Most laws and legal systems—at least in the Western world—are quite similar in their essential themes, arising
from similar values and similar social, economic, and political conditions, and they typically differ less in their substantive
content than in their jargon and procedures.
Communication between legal systems is the focus of legal
translation and legal lexicography, which deals with the
principles of producing a law dictionary.
One of the fundamental similarities across different legal systems is that, to be of general approval and observation, a law
has to appear to be public, effective, and legitimate, in the sense that it has to be available to the knowledge of the citizen in common places or means, it needs to contain instruments to grant its application,
and it has to be issued under given formal procedures from a recognized authority.
In the context of most legal systems, laws are enacted through the processes of constitutional charter, constitutional amendment, legislation,
executive order, rulemaking, and adjudication; within Common law jurisdictions, rulings
by judges are an important additional source of legal rules.
However, de facto laws also come into existence through custom and tradition. (See generally Consuetudinary law; Anarchist law.)
Law has an anthropological dimension. In order to have a culture of law, people must dwell in a society where a government exists whose authority is
hard to evade and generally recognised as legitimate. People forego personal revenge
or self-help and choose instead to take their grievances before the government
and its agents, who arbitrate disputes and enforce penalties.
This behaviour is contrasted with the culture of honor, where respect for persons and
groups stems from fear of the disproportionate revenge they may exact if their person, property, or prerogatives are not
respected. Cultures of law must be maintained. They can be eroded by declining respect for the law, achieved either by weak
government unable to wield its authority, or by burdensome restrictions that attempt to forbid behaviour prevalent in the culture
or in some subculture of the society. When a culture of law declines, there is
a possibility that an undesirable culture of honor will arise in its place.
A particular society or community adopts a specific set of laws to regulate the
behavior of its own members, to order life in its political territory, to grant
or acknowledge the rights and privileges of its citizens and other people who may come
under the jurisdiction of its courts, and to resolve
disputes.
There are several distinct laws and legal traditions, and each jurisdiction has its own set of laws and its own legal system. Individually codified laws are known as
statutes, and the collective body of laws relating to one subject or emanating from
one source are usually identified by specific reference. (E.g., Roman law,
Common law, and Criminal
law.)
Moreover, the several different levels of government each produce their own
laws, though the extent to which law is centralized varies. Thus, at any one place there can be conflicting laws in force at the
local, regional, state, national, or international levels.
(See conflict of laws, Preemption of State and Local
Laws.)
Legal systems
- The civilian legal system or civil law system is the general
typology of legal systems found in most countries. It is an alternative to common
law system and has its roots in Roman law. It is employed by almost every
country that was not a colony of Britain. In most jurisdictions the civil law is codified in the form of a civil codes, but in some, like
Scotland it remains uncodified. Most codes follow the tradition of Code Napoléon in some fashion. Notably, the German code was developed from
Roman law with reference to German legal tradition.
- Socialist law is the term for civil law as practiced within states of
the former Soviet Union and its satellites; as well
as within the Laws of China, Cuba, North Korea, and Vietnam. With the end of the Cold War, most of these nations are incorporating laws compatible with private property and capitalism.
- See also: Anarchist law, Canon law, Civil law, English Law, European Union Law, International law, Japanese law, Legal code, Roman law, Scots Law
Branches of law, a sampling
They are not comprehensive.
- Space law regulates events occuring outside Earth's atmosphere. At present
this is limited to several treaties against atomic testing in space.
Legal subject areas
Administrative law - Admiralty - Alternative
dispute resolution - Appellate review - Civil procedure - Civil
rights - Commercial law - Comparative law - Consuetudinary law - Contracts - Constitutional
law - Courts of England and Wales -
Corporations law - Criminal law - Criminal procedure - Environmental law - Equity -
Evidence - Family law - Human rights - Immigration - Intellectual
property - Jurisprudence - Law and economics - Agency - Law of Obligations - Labor
law - Land use - List of items
for which possession is restricted - Military law - Philosophy of law - Practice of law - Private law - Procedural law - Property
law - Statutory law - Tax
law - Technology Law -
Torts - Trusts and
Estates - Cyber law - Water
law
Subjects auxiliary to law
Government - Legal
history - Law and
literature - Political science
Terms, case law, legislation and other resources
Legal books
Further reading
- Cheyenne Way: Conflict & Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence, Karl N. Llewellyn and E. Adamson Hoebel,
University of Oklahoma Press, 1983, trade paperback, 374 pages, ISBN 0806118555
- The Bilingual LSP Dictionary. Principles and Practice for Legal language, Sandro Nielsen, Gunter Narr Verlag
1994.
- Other books by Karl N. Llewellyn
See also
External links
|