|
It is recommended that the reader be familiar with antiderivatives, integrals, and limits.
In calculus, an improper integral is the limit of a definite integral, as an endpoint,
or both endpoints, of the interval approaches either a specified real number
or ∞ or −∞. The integral
-
can be interpreted as
-
but it is not necessary to interpret it that way, since it may be interpreted instead as a Lebesgue integral over the set (0, ∞). On the other hand
-
cannot be interpreted as a Lebesgue integral, since
-
This is therefore a "properly" improper integral, whose value is given by
-
One can speak of the singularities of an improper integral, meaning those points of the extended real number line at which limits are used.
Such an integral is often written symbolically just like a standard definite integral, perhaps with infinity as a
limit of integration. But that conceals the limiting process. By using the more advanced Lebesgue integral, rather than the Riemann
integral, one can in some cases bypass this requirement, but if one simply wants to evaluate the limit to a definite answer,
that technical fix may not necessarily help. It is more or less essential in the theoretical treatment for the Fourier transform, with pervasive use of integrals over the whole real
line.
Infinite bounds of integration
The most basic of improper integrals are integrals such as: ∫0∞ dx /
(x2 + 1). Such an integral can be evaluted by noting the antiderivative: arctan x.
The integral is
-
Vertical asymptotes at bounds of integration
Consider ∫01 dx / x(2/3). This integral involves a function with a
vertical asymptote at x = 0.
One can evaluate this integral by evaluating from b to 1, and then take the limit as b approaches 0. One
should note that the antiderivative of the above function is (3/2)(x(2/3)); which can be evaluated by direct
substition: (3/2)(1 − b(2/3)). The limit as b approaches 0 equals: (3/2) − 0 = 3/2 = 1.5.
Consider the difference in values of two limits:
-
-
The former is the Cauchy principal value of the otherwise ill-defined expression
-
Similarly, we have
-
but
-
The former is the principal value of the otherwise ill-defined expression
-
These pathologies do not afflict "Lebesgue-integrable" functions, that is, functions the integrals of whose absolute values are finite.
|